The Covid ‘jab’: “We made a big mistake. The spike protein itself is a toxin.”

The statement

(This time I am providing more than a short statement, in the hope that it will be read in its entirety. See below for source acknowledgment.)

‘We Made a Big Mistake’ — COVID Vaccine Spike Protein Travels From Injection Site, Can Cause Organ Damage

Research obtained by a group of scientists shows the COVID vaccine spike protein can travel from the injection site and accumulate in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.

COVID vaccine researchers had previously assumed mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like traditional vaccines. The vaccine’s spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the injection site at the shoulder muscle or local lymph nodes.

But new research obtained by a group of scientists contradicts that theory, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week.

“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” said Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”

Bridle, who was awarded a $230,000 grant by the Canadian government last year for research on COVID vaccine development, said he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to Pfizer’s “biodistribution study.”

Biodistribution studies are used to determine where an injected compound travels in the body, and which tissues or organs it accumulates in.

“It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” Bridle said in an interview with Alex Pierson where he first disclosed the data. “Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting.”

The Sars-CoV-2 has a spike protein on its surface. That spike protein is what allows it to infect our bodies, Bridle explained. “That is why we have been using the spike protein in our vaccines,” Bridle said. “The vaccines we’re using get the cells in our bodies to manufacture that protein. If we can mount an immune response against that protein, in theory we could prevent this virus from infecting the body. That is the theory behind the vaccine.”

“However, when studying the severe COVID-19, […] heart problems, lots of problems with the cardiovascular system, bleeding and clotting, are all associated with COVID-19,”  he added. “In doing that research, what has been discovered by the scientific community, the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.”

When the purified spike protein is injected into the blood of research animals, they experience damage to the cardiovascular system and the protein can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to the brain, Bridle explained.

The biodistribution study obtained by Bridle shows the COVID spike protein gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulates in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries.

“We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein, Bridle said. “It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation.”

A large number of studies have shown the most severe effects of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, such as blood clotting and bleeding, are due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus itself.

A recent study in Clinical and Infectious Diseases led by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School measured longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 recipients of the Moderna vaccine 1 and 29 days after the first dose and 1-28 days after the second dose.

Out of these individuals, 11 had detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein in blood plasma as early as one day after the first vaccine dose, including three who had detectable levels of spike protein. A “subunit” protein called S1, part of the spike protein, was also detected. 

Spike protein was detected an average of 15 days after the first injection, and one patient had spike protein detectable on day 29 –– one day after a second vaccine dose –– which disappeared two days later.

The results showed S1 antigen production after the initial vaccination can be detected by day one and is present beyond the injection site and the associated regional lymph nodes.

Assuming an average adult blood volume of approximately 5 liters, this corresponds to peak levels of approximately 0.3 micrograms of circulating free antigen for a vaccine designed only to express membrane-anchored antigen.

In a study published in Nature Neuroscience, lab animals injected with purified spike protein into their bloodstream developed cardiovascular problems. The spike protein also crossed the blood-brain barrier and caused damage to the brain.

It was a grave mistake to believe the spike protein would not escape into the blood circulation, according to Bridle. “Now, we have clear-cut evidence that the vaccines that make the cells in our deltoid muscles manufacture this protein — that the vaccine itself, plus the protein — gets into blood circulation,” he said.

Bridle said the scientific community has discovered the spike protein, on its own, is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.

Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels, Bridle said. “When that happens it can do one of two things. It can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding,” he added.

Both clotting and bleeding are associated with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Bridle also said the spike protein in circulation would explain recently reported heart problems in vaccinated teens.

Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it is now clear vaccine content is being delivered to the spleen and the glands, including the ovaries and the adrenal glands, and is being shed into the medium and then eventually reaches the bloodstream causing systemic damage.

“ACE2 receptors are common in the heart and brain,” she added. “And this is how the spike protein causes cardiovascular and cognitive problems.”

Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist, warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December mRNA vaccines could cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways not assessed in safety trials.

In a public submission, Whelan sought to alert the FDA to the potential for vaccines designed to create immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to instead cause injuries.

Whelan was concerned the mRNA vaccine technology utilized by Pfizer and Moderna had “the potential to cause microvascular injury (inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi) to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.”

The source

Dr Byram Bridle, Associate Professor of Viral Immunology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada

as quoted by Megan Redshaw in The Defender, 3 June 2023

( https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=9b0b9b9c-6cf1-4252-b15f-4b5da9fb8e42 )

For original interview with Professor Bridle, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sis1Sddzbqk .

My take on it

The more we learn, the uglier this story gets.

And we the public learn about the ‘biodistribution’ of this widely promoted and yet life-threatening injection only because of expert enquiry to a foreign country (ie Japan), not through timely disclosure by the manufacturer.

The pretext for the ‘jab’ is to alleviate symptoms (not to stop infection or transmission).  If you think about it, masking symptoms makes as much sense as removing the battery from a smoke detector.  In the vast majority of cases*, infection is asymptomatic anyway;  and in the very few cases* where symptoms are present and significant, they serve (in the hands of a qualified medical practitioner) to assist diagnosis and treatment.

In the past, much of the resistance to vaccines has been due to the inclusion of particular ingredients, including heavy metals, synthetic substances such as hydrogel, and foreign genetic material.  If Professor Bridle and the other researchers that he cites are correct, we are now dealing with something far worse – an injected toxin replicating at the cellular level and circulating throughout the body, including across the blood:brain barrier.

Early on in life, we learn that people make mistakes.  The sooner we admit them, the less damage is done.

What do you expect will happen next?

* The term ‘case’ has a specific meaning in medicine.  The administration of a PCR test and a so-called ‘positive’ result, do not meet that criterion, as has been determined by eg the Lisbon Court of Appeal. (See my earlier post on this.)

Dying for some tucker?

Comment:

(The following is an abstract of a scientific paper.  Feel free to skim-read!)

Gut microbiota has been implicated as a pivotal contributing factor in diet-related obesity; however, its role in development of disease phenotypes in human genetic obesity such as Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) remains elusive. In this hospitalized intervention trial with PWS (n = 17) and simple obesity (n = 21) children, a diet rich in non-digestible carbohydrates induced significant weight loss and concomitant structural changes of the gut microbiota together with reduction of serum antigen load and alleviation of inflammation. Co-abundance network analysis of 161 prevalent bacterial draft genomes assembled directly from metagenomic datasets showed relative increase of functional genome groups for acetate production from carbohydrates fermentation. NMR-based metabolomic profiling of urine showed diet-induced overall changes of host metabotypes and identified significantly reduced trimethylamine N-oxide and indoxyl sulfate, host-bacteria co-metabolites known to induce metabolic deteriorations. Specific bacterial genomes that were correlated with urine levels of these detrimental co-metabolites were found to encode enzyme genes for production of their precursors by fermentation of choline or tryptophan in the gut. When transplanted into germ-free mice, the pre-intervention gut microbiota induced higher inflammation and larger adipocytes compared with the post-intervention microbiota from the same volunteer. Our multi-omics-based systems analysis indicates a significant etiological contribution of dysbiotic gut microbiota to both genetic and simple obesity in children, implicating a potentially effective target for alleviation.

 

Source:  

eBiomedicine, August 2015, Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages 968–984 (http://www.ebiomedicine.com/article/S2352-3964(15)30064-5/fulltext)

 

My thoughts:

I might have a four-year undergraduate degree in the biologcal sciences, but it makes my head spin, reading through papers like these.  There are some very clever people out there.

For the layman,  these findings are of course a bridge too far (in fact, several bridges).

For those in between, and that is where I see myself, the fun is to extract the practical takeaways, the So-whats? .    The last line of this paper gets close:  ‘Dietary modulation of gut microbiota may become a promising strategy for being integrated into the management of metabolic diseases. ‘

But even that needs unpacking:  The food that we eat affects which bugs thrive in our gut, and that ‘mix’ affects our health, because the bad bugs produce toxins that cause inflammation.   If we want a ‘healthier structure’, we need in particular to eat more indigestible carbs.

The diet  used in this trial included ‘whole grains, traditional Chinese medicinal foods, and prebiotics’, plus ‘appropriate amounts of vegetables, fruits and nuts ‘.  For starters  I’d suggest that home-made organic sauerkraut become a staple.

And meanwhile I know that there are world-class Australian gastroenterologists who continue to dismiss the significance of diet in disease.  But then that is not where they have been trained to look.

Let the learning journey continue!