mRNA

The jab: yes, that mRNA does change our genes

Posted on by hk80u

The statement

“For the first time in the peer-reviewed literature — we present direct molecular evidence that genetic material from a COVID-19 mRNA “vaccine” has integrated into the human genome. …

Our findings of genomic integration may help explain why, in 2025, infants are dying at a 77% excess rate among those who neither had COVID-19 nor received the vaccine, but whose parents received mRNA injections years earlier. These patterns raise grave concern about transgenerational epigenetic effects of integrated “vaccine” genetic material. Genomic integration in parents—particularly mothers—may enable the transfer of Pfizer or Moderna genetic material to the fetus years after injection. Urgent investigation into these potential transgenerational harms is warranted.”

The source

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH from FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse) petermcculloughmd@substack.com, 15 October 2025.

Hulscher, an epidemiologist, is co-author of the peer-reviewed paper:

Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination | International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science

My take on it

As we suspected, and warned, from the outset.

Years and years of pompous, ignorant and deceitful reassurances continue to fall away in the face of the evidence.

And the more we learn, the worse it looks.

Earlier this month the Alliance of Indigenous Nations (A.I.N.) International Tribunal became the first governing body and judicial authority in the world to issue an ORDER declaring mRNA nanoparticle injections biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. The Indigenous Nations (A.I.N.) International Tribunal stated:

“This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the COVID-19 injections, mRNA injections, or mRNA nanoparticle injections, are in fact biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the ‘COVID-19 nanoparticle injections’ or ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ or ‘COVID-19 injections‘ meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction according to the Biological Weapons Anti Terrorism Act, of 1989 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023), Canada‘s Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Implementation Act, 2004, and the International Biological Weapons Convention. This Order and Declaration is intended to have immediate worldwide effect.”

Meanwhile the carnage continues.

The jab: Federal agency approval unsupportable

Posted on by hk80u

The statement

‘Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.’

The source

‘COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign’, peer-reviewed paper by M. Nathaniel Mead • Stephanie Seneff • Russ Wolfinger • Jessica Rose • Kris Denhaerynck • Steve Kirsch • Peter A. McCullough

(https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052#!/ 24 January 2024

My take on it

What’s left to say?

Let him who has ears, let him hear.

The evidence cries out for a moratorium.

The jab:  “a full ventilation of all the facts”

Posted on by hk80u

The statement

FASA (the Freedom Alliance of South Africa, AD) has approached the High Court in Pretoria, South Africa, to review and set aside the authorisation of Pfizer’s vaccine products on the basis that the authorisation was irrational and unlawful.  If successful this will result in the removal of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines from the domestic market.  The case is under the custodianship of Advocate Erin-Dianne Richards, briefed by Daniel Eloff of Hurter Spies.  The lawyers explain the significance of the case:  “FASA’s aim is to subject the South African regulator’s decision to judicial scrutiny.  They argue that the regulator’s decision was based on flawed and inaccurate trial data analysis presented by a heavily conflicted Pfizer, and that it is therefore legally invalid.  Their aim is not only to ensure legal compliance – but to set precedent requiring a higher level of statutory scrutiny in the case of future vaccine authorisations in the interest of public health.  Whatever the decision of the Court, this case is important.  While it has arguably been possible to suppress and distort facts in the public narrative either for or against the vaccines, this will not be possible before our Courts.  This case will see a full ventilation of all relevant facts pertaining to South Africa’s authorisation of the Pfizer vaccines.”

The source

Dr Aseem Malhotra (@DrAseemMalhotra), eminent UK cardiologist, in a tweet ( https://twitter.com/DrAseemMalhotra/status/1641322215143530497 )

See also https://theprint.in/world/british-indian-medic-backs-legal-review-of-covid-vaccine-in-south-africa-high-court/1482252/

The application was lodged on 23 March 2023.

My take on it

Dr Malhotra, who is a co-applicant, recognises that that this case has significance beyond South Africa:

“South Africa’s Constitution and its Constitutional jurisprudence has motivated, inspired and led the World.  My personal hope is that here, too, the South African judiciary will lead the way towards a global rectification of a serious injustice.”

I share his hope, and I pray that it is so.  To date it would seem to me that courts in other jurisdictions have flown in the face of reason to find ways of avoiding “a full ventilation of the facts”.

But Why ?

The jab: The UK Telegraph calls for justice

Posted on by hk80u

The statement

“Matt Hancock should be arrested for wilful misconduct in public office. The slithy tove can – and must – be dragged before a Select Committee and made to answer for his actions and the vast hurt they have caused.”

(Matt Handcock is the former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.)


The source

The UK Telegraph, viewed today; quoted by NaturalNews.com, cited by Martin Geddes on Telegram, 15 March 2023)

( https://www.telegraph.co.uk/columnists/2023/03/07/matt-hancock-should-arrested-wilful-misconduct-public-office/ )

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-03-12-telegraph-headline-arrest-covid-lockdown-matt-hancock.html

My take on it

And so it begins.

I just hope that it’s true. According to the Telegraph, “Award-winning journalist Allison Pearson is a columnist and the chief interviewer of the Daily Telegraph.”

Question: What has prompted this headline, against the tide?

Answer: “The Telegraph has obtained more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages between Matt Hancock and other ministers and officials at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. … For eight days now, The Telegraph has published the most breathtakingly damning stories about the misuse of power (and “science”) by Matt Hancock and his cabal during the pandemic.”

The very word secret is repugnant in a free and open society.

“The Telegraph has obtained …” I love that well-worn phrase. And I thank God for leaks and for whistleblowers who bring light and fresh air where it’s needed. Suddenly the obvious conclusions may now be spoken out – that the UK’s former Health Minister is only an individual after all, despite all that power; that he has abused that power in a most egregious way; and that justice cries out for him and his lackeys to be brought to fair trial for wilful misconduct in public office.

Can’t happen here? You watch.