The jab: Is shedding real? Looks like.

The statement

“Initial comparison of nasal swabs acquired from children living in vaccinated households revealed readily detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG , especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARSCoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in non-vaccinated households.”

The source

Dr Ross Ked and others, from the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, in a pre-print article, Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity, published on 28 April 2022

://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full.pdf

My take on it

We were warned that it might happen.

Then we were reassured that it couldn’t.

Now the research says that it does.

Mind you, the research only goes so far. It shows that vaccinated parents will engender a related immune response in their (unvaccinated) children, via air-borne antibody transfer; and that unvaccinated parents will not.

It remains to be seen what the longer term effects will be, for good or for ill.

The jab: Isn’t it a crime to conceal evidence?

The statement

“Utah ICU Nurses Try To Hide Fibrous Clot Coughed Up By Jabbed 32 Year Old”

The source

Dr Jane Ruby, on her Show (?Tuesday 26 April 2022), from which the above statement is a program title.

(https://www.brighteon.com/e550e5d1-ff99-4312-ac87-d42475d69363 )

The background to this story is that an ICU nurse in a Utah hospital recently witnessed and photographed a very unusual, grotesque, fibrous clot exuded (“coughed up”) by an ‘otherwise healthy’ (?) 32 year old young man who was known to be double-jabbed. When she and her colleague enquired they were told the clot was caused by vaping. A partial transcript follows:

“These shots are creating this material, which is self-assembling, according to Fauci’s December 4th 2019 testimony before the House Energy Committee  – he said it, he said ‘self-assembling nanoparticles’ – the body is cooperatively creating, co-creating along with these materials, being directed by these materials, self-assembling, these obstructive, disgusting, horrific, slimy – we don’t know what they’re made of –  clot castings in lungs, in blood vessels, God knows what else.   …..

”I don’t know what else to say, ladies and gentlemen. I am doing my best here. But you nurses in these hospitals that see this … You think this is the only one that happened in Utah? This is happening in hundreds and hundreds of hospitals across the United States right now, today.  Come forward, band together, stop this from going into six-month-olds.  It’s a matter of time.  And there’s not much time left.”

My take on it

I continue to pray for whistle-blowers, and to thank God for them.

Dr Ruby rightly calls the others to account, for their complicity of silence.

I know very little about vaping (aka e-cigarettes). If this clot is one of the side-effects, it looks like a great advertisement for reverting to conventional smoking.

A quick scan of the literature shows multiple references to blood clotting from e-cigarettes, but none to a clot of this nature. (See eg https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8056776/ which references the CDC criteria for the diagnosis of e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI))

We await confirmation, either way.

And either way, there is no justification for concealing the evidence. Isn’t that a crime?

The jab:  Two reasons why it’s called ‘the clot shot’

The statement

“When I do the embalming, I have to go into the vein. And in order for the embalming process, I have to allow blood to be drained. So I actually pulled this huge, long clot — fibrous looking clot — out prior to an embalming.  It just isn’t normal.  Typically, a blood clot is smooth; it’s blood that has coagulated together. But when you squeeze it, or touch it or try to pick it up, it generally falls apart … you can almost squeeze it between your fingers and get it back to blood again. But this white fibrous stuff is strong. It’s not weak at all. You can manipulate it, it’s very pliable. It’s not hard … it is not normal. I don’t know how anybody can live with something like this inside of them.”

The source

Richard Hirschman (Board-Certified Embalmer and Funeral Director) on The Dr. Jane Ruby Show

(https://www.brighteon.com/7341ab43-5bdd-41d2-bb6a-e9e7660b012d )

See also interview of Richard Hirschman by Steve Kirsch (https://deeprootsathome.com/embalmer-reveals-novel-widespread-fibrous-clots-in-65-of-cases/ )

(‘Richard Hirschman has been a board-certified embalmer for over 20 years. In 2021, he started noticing very odd fibrous blood clots that he had never seen before.

In Jan 2022, 60+% of his cases exhibited these fibrous clots. The only rational conclusion is that the clots, which have proven deadly to their owners, are all associated with the COVID vaccines.  Nobody from the mainstream media or medical community wants to touch this story. It’s not just Hirschman who is seeing this; it is everyone in the industry he’s talked to about it. They are seeing it, but Richard is the only person in the US (to my knowledge) willing to speak out about it.’  (Steve Kirsch, as above)

My take on it

In the case of deaths following the jab, autopsies have been the exception rather than the rule.

Maybe we could call an embalming a ‘Clayton’s Autopsy’, the autopsy you have when you are not having an autopsy.

It would appear that within the industry, the increasing incidence of unusual clots following the jab is an open secret.

Hirschman attests to a conspiracy of silence, beyond the industry, for the usual reasons.

The jabs cause clots.

“I don’t know how anybody can live with something like this inside of them.”

Evidently you can’t.

Knowing what we now know, taking the jab is a suicidal risk, according to the French Courts.

Knowing what we know now, only a clot would take the jab.

Covid 19:  is Remdesivir a death protocol in hospitals?

The statement

“How is it possible that the United States of America, one of the top industrialized nations in the world, including in our healthcare systems, how is it possible that we still lead the world in COVID-19 deaths?

There’s only one thing we’ve done from the beginning that no one else was doing – and it was Anthony Fauci’s death protocol in hospitals using a drug called remdesivir that he knew would kill either a quarter to 30 percent of all people he gave the drug to in hospitals in five to 10 days.”

 

The source 

Dr Bryan Ardis, on the Pete Santilli Show, 24 March 2022 ( https://www.brighteon.com/5d2350df-0e57-492f-95a5-672f768928a7 )

See also Dr Ardis’ testimony to a senate hearing on 4 March 2022 https://rumble.com/embed/vu8503/?pub=4 )


My take on it

Dr Ardis’ thesis is that people being hospitalised for Covid-19 are being treated routinely with a proven-unsafe drug that attacks the kidneys, resulting in multiple organ failure and often death.; and that emergency care physicians are thinking that they are witnessing the progression of disease when in fact they are witnessing the toxic effects of an expensive pharmaceutical drug.

Dr Ardis referred to mortality data that he provided to lawyer Thomas Renz for analysis:

“According to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) data, almost 26% of people put on Remdesivir die. But it is a huge moneymaker for the government and Big Pharma.”

 

 

Dr Paul Maric, one of the best ICU doctors in America, testifies about the dangers of remdesivir and the corruption in our medical system for prescribing it. Though it is deadly, doctors are being incentivized to use it on patients. Remdesivir killed more than 50% of the animals during its clinical trials. Yet the FDA still approved it.” ( https://drsircus.com/general/pharmaceutical-murder-with-remdesivir/ 14 April 2022)

Further damning evidence comes from the horrific performance of Remdesivir in a human clinical trial against Ebola. In that study Remdesivir had an over 50% death rate. (https://senatormastriano.com/medicalfreedompanel/ from 1h15m)

“The Palm Study Group investigated four drugs for the use of Ebola. The results were published on December 12, 2019, in the New England Journal of Medicine. That date is particularly important because that signaled the beginning of Covid. The Data Safety Monitoring Board of that study terminated the study of Remdesivir. TERMINATED, because Remdesivir INCREASED THE RISKS OF DEATH AND RENAL FAILURE. It was SUCH A TOXIC DRUG the Data Safety Monitoring Board terminated the use of REMDESIVIR.” (https://drsircus.com/general/pharmaceutical-murder-with-remdesivir/ )

Australia? As to designated treatment for Covid-19 post hospitalisation, basically the same story. Remdesivir was the first drug approved by the TGA for treatment of Covid-19 disease, for ‘adults over 18 years of age with severe COVID-19 symptoms who have been hospitalised’. It was approved on 10 July 2020, six months after the first confirmed case. (Prior to Remdesivir, no drug had been approved for this application, and the suggested use of hydroxychloroquine had been resolutely opposed.) Thirteen months after Remdesivir the first of a succession of monoclonal antibody drugs was approved, and then some others, generally for pre-hospitalisation application or for prophylaxis.