The Jab: Why is graphene in there?

The statement

“We present here our research on the presence of graphene in covid vaccines. We have carried out a random screening of graphene-like nanoparticles visible at the optical microscopy in seven random samples of vials from four different trademarks, coupling images with their spectral signatures of RAMAN vibration. By this technique, called micro-RAMAN, we have been able to determine the presence of graphene in these samples, after screening more than 110 objects selected for their graphene-like appearance under optical microscopy. Out of them, a group of 28 objects have been selected, due to the compatibility of both images and spectra with the presence of graphene derivatives, based on the correspondence of these signals with those obtained from standards and scientific literature. The identification of graphene oxide structures can be regarded as conclusive in 8 of them, due to the high spectral correlation with the standard. In the remaining 20 objects, images coupled with Raman signals show a very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphene structures, however different than the standard used here.”


The source

‘Detection of Graphene in COVID19 Vaccines by Micro-Raman Spectroscopy’, a report by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, Associate Professor at the University of Almeria in Spain, published 2 November, 2021


My take on it

It’s early days.

Or is it?

The internet abounds with video clip of CV injection sites manifesting magnetism; and it is logical to ask why.

Many months ago a Dr Campra at the University of Almeria in Spain was commissioned to do an initial exploratory analysis of a single vial, by some fellow countrymen who asked Why, and who postulated the presence of graphene. Dr Campra reportedly confirmed the presence of graphene oxide in that vial, and invited other researchers to continue the investigation..

(When an element exists in more than one crystalline form, those forms are called allotropes. Graphene is a carbon allotrope, as are diamond and graphite. Graphene, which is isolated from crystalline graphite, is a flat monolayer composed of single-atom-thick, two-dimensional sheets of a hexagonally arranged honeycomb lattice. Because of its unique structural, specific surface area and mechanical characteristics, the functions and applications of graphene have gained considerable attention since the discovery of the material in 2004.

The graphene family of nanomaterials (GFNs) is known to be toxic in the human body:

“GFNs can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection . GFNs can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and bloodplacenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas, lung fibrosis and adverse health effects to exposed persons.” (Ref )

A more recent paper by Dr Campra referenced at ResearchGate covers four main brands and 7 separate vials. It indicates that graphene-like structures were definitely present in 4 of the 7 injection vials sampled, and quite possibly in 2 others.The closing comment of the researcher seems appropriate in the circumstances:

“This research remains open and is made available to scientific community for discussion. We make a call for independent researchers, with no conflict of interest or coaction from any institution to make wider counter-analysis of these products to achieve a more detailed knowledge of the composition and potential health risk of these experimental drugs, reminding that graphene materials have a potential toxicity on human beings and its presence has not been declared in any emergency use authorization. We leave a link to download this report at the end of this video.”

Some months ago another researcher, a Dr Andreas Noack in Austria, reported finding graphene hydroxide in some CV vaccine vials. Dr Noack had a PhD in this area and claimed to be the only expert who knew the science behind graphene (Hydr)oxide in Europe. He was arrested while making his video report ( He finally published the video interview on the 23rd of November 2021 ( and was killed 2 days later in a brutal assault.

In the circumstances I conjectured that Dr Campra’s request for further independent research on the potential toxicity of an undeclared ingredient in an Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) vaccine may well fall on deaf ears.

Not so. In an interview posted on Telegram on 28 January, an NZ doctor, Matt Shelton, reported that a local group of scientists had examined a vial from one of the major manufacturers and found (as did he) the same sorts of nano-scale ingredients reported by others (“tiny, tiny but very complex nanoscale technology … what appears to be machinery or circuitry”. ( ) In Dr Shelton’s view, “It needs investigating by the professional regulators charged with protecting the public.” Indeed it does.

Since then the presence of graphene in three leading brands has been confirmed by a UK lab. On February 7 lawyer Lois Bayliss handed in a petition requesting an urgent public scientific review, regarding the safety, legitimacy and ethical implications of the ingredients and the biotechnology that are making people magnetic post-COVID-19 vaccination. (Ref :// A Case Briefing Document has also been lodged with UK Police, accusing the three manufacturers and four arms of government of Corporate Manslaughter and Gross Criminal Manslaughter; and therein reminding the police that their first duty is to protect public safety. (Ref )

If the Precautionary Principle means anything, this global injection program should have been halted long since, on multiple grounds. Those who sustain it have been duly warned.