The CEO of the OneAmerica insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18-64) was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID. Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was a 40%.
Before the #Covid vaccines, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for people disabled and not able to work, was between 29 and 30 million on an absolute basis for 4 or 5 years. Then in February of 2021 (2 months after the vaccine roll-out started) this number took off, and went to a high of 33.2 million in September of 2022.
Since February of 2021, the disability rate for the employed is up 31%, and the general US population’s disability rate is up 9% from February of 2021 through to December of 2022.
Ed Dowd, industry analyst, quoted by Tucker Carlson (https://t.me/DowdEdward/2569)
My take on
Scientific method relies on testing the likelihood of something happening by chance, rather than it happening due to some specific cause.
The numbers that Dowd quotes are off the charts. There is virtually no chance that these excess deaths and injuries happened by chance.
Didn’t someone say that ‘one death is a tragedy; a thousand deaths is a statistic.’ How wrong. How cruel. How symptomatic of those driving this juggernaut.
A thousand deaths is a thousand tragedies, and the ripples spread out from there.
Australian official mortality data show no clear evidence of significant excess deaths in 2020, implying from an older WHO definition that there was no COVID-19 pandemic. A seasonality analysis suggests that COVID-19 deaths in 2020 were likely misclassifications of influenza and pneumonia deaths. Australian excess mortality became significant only since 2021 when the level was high enough to justify calling a pandemic. Significant excess mortality was strongly correlated (+74%) with COVID-19 mass injections five months earlier. Strength of correlation, consistency, specificity, temporality, and dose-response relationship are foremost Bradford Hill criteria which are satisfied by the data to suggest the iatrogenesis of the Australian pandemic, where excess deaths were largely caused by COVID-19 injections. Supporting this hypothesis also is the fact that the youngest 0-44 age group with lowest risks of COVID infection and death has suffered disproportionately the highest multiples of excess mortality with the advent of COVID injections – a result which is unlikely to have other natural explanations. Therefore, Australia appears likely to be experiencing an iatrogenic pandemic and the associated mortality risk/benefit ratio for COVID injections is very high.
Wilson Sy, Investment Analytics, Australian COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bradford Hill analysis of iatrogenic excess mortality, published February 2023
Dr Wilson Sy is currently the principal of Investment Analytics Research undertaking industry consulting and research in investment and superannuation. His background includes six years working as the Principal Research Analyst at the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA).
My take on it
I had been waiting for this piece of work. Indeed I had been exploring whom I could encourage to initiate it – someone with the technical competence, the independence, the credibility and the will. Thank you, Wilson.
We now have an exemplary application of the Bradford Hill causation tenets to the question of whether deaths in Australia were caused by the mRNA injections, or just associated with them.
And we have a lot more.
The Abstract gives us two key takeaways:
There was no pandemic of upper respiratory tract infection in 2021. (And remember: that claim, together with another false claim about lack of effective alternative treatments), was used to justify the roll-out of the mRNA injections.)
Excess deaths followed the administration of the mRNA injections – the misnamed ‘vaccines’ – and were caused by them.
“Did the US government ever contact you or anyone else at Twitter to moderate or censor certain tweets? Yes or No?”
“We received legal commands to remove content from the platform from the US government and governments all around the world.” (Ms Gadde)
“Thank God for Matt Taibbi. Thank God for Elon Musk, for allowing to show us and the world that Twitter was basically a subsidiary of the FBI, censoring real medical voices with real expertise that put real American lives at risk because they didn’t have that information.”
Representative Nancy Mace, House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, quizzing Twitter executives including Ms Gadde on 9 February 2023 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0ME1Mx50gQ )
My take on it
My earlier post on the whole-of-society censorship model explains how the whole system collaborates.
This congressional testimony fleshes out a significant player in just one of its four domains, ie the media.
Dr Pierre Kory has recently condemned the general stance of the media in steadfastly refusing even to recognise vaccine injury.
It is probably helpful to overall awakening of the general public for these revelations to be coming from both directions.
“What I found was a clear signal, that something in 2021 changed the health of service members. …..
After querying all pilots across the DOD, for all-cause morbidity and mortality, I found a stunning increase in the number of reportable events, spiking from an average of 226 reportable events a year (2016-2019) to 4,059 reports in 2022. …..
The point is there is a statistically significant increase in death, permanent harm, or severe temporary harm in young healthy fit pilots ….. in the “post-glitch” DMED, the number of reportable events across the DOD had gone from a four-year average (2016-2019) of 40,813 to 110,000 in 2020 to over 200,000 in 2022.”
Lt. Col.Theresa Long, M.D., MPH, a board-certified aerospace medicine doctor and Army Brigade flight surgeon with specialty training as an aviation mishap investigator and safety officer; interviewed by Carly Mayberry for The Epoch Times, 31 January 2023. Long was one of four whistleblowers who initially reported a spike in reportable events a year ago.