Jab survey:  Thousands of Australians coerced

The comment

“Thank you to the 26,680 Australians who completed the anonymous online survey carried out by Clarity on Health between 18th February and 28th March 2022.

The survey results are now available. They indicate that thousands of Australians felt coerced to have the COVID-19 vaccinations. Many of them got vaccinated because it was mandated for their job, and not for medical reasons.     …..

Key findings were:

* 7,559 vaccinated Australians said they had felt “extremely pressured” to have their COVID-19 vaccination

* 8,362 unvaccinated Australians said they were currently (in Quarter 1 2022) feeling extreme pressure to be vaccinated

* 57.9% of vaccinated respondents said their primary reason for having the injection was either to keep their job or because it was mandated for their profession.

* Only 11.3% of vaccinated people reported a main reason for vaccination connected with COVID-19 disease itself.”

The source

Clarity on Health website (https://clarityonhealth.org/ ), as reported via press release in the Australian Spectator, 21 March 2022 ( https://spectator.com.au/2022/03/we-must-record-why-australians-got-vaccinated/ )

My take on it

“The Paris Peace Conference of 1919 was the first diplomatic conference on this scale – there were 32 governments represented – at which Australia had independent status. Previously, the Dominions of the British Empire had been represented internationally by London or had attended diplomatic meetings as part of a delegation of the Empire. However, the ‘blood sacrifice’ of the First World War had changed the balance of imperial relationships, and after some difficult negotiations with the US and France, Australia, like Canada, South Africa, New Zealand and India, was granted the right to attend the Paris conference. This gave Hughes the platform on which to pursue what he thought were Australia’s distinctive interests.  In one of their meetings British Prime Minister Wilson asked Hughes whether he expected the five million Australians he represented to be set against the twelve hundred million represented by the conference, Hughes responded, ‘I represent sixty thousand dead’.”  (Source)

Fast Forward to 2022:  A judge in Australia’s Federal Court finds that neither advocacy group AVN nor a mandate-affected individual has standing to pursue an application for a judicial review into the failure of the government to halt the Covid ‘vaccination’ program – “an experimental jab that has already killed hundreds of our countrymen and women and injured nearly 80,000.’

To deny that the AVN – as the leading advocacy group in its domain – has standing, surely flies in the face of reason, given the hundreds of deaths and tens of thousands of injuries associated with the jab.

The significance of the Clarity on Health survey needs to be seen in that light.  It is another single complementary fact-based advocate testifying to the infringement of rights of tens of thousands of individuals, and echoing the call for justice.

I too echo that call.

The jab: Unprecedented vascular obstruction causing death?

The statement

“Look, this is what’s in people’s bodies. This is what’s being removed from people’s damaged hearts, and you can see why. I mean, my God, again for the radio viewers, … I don’t even know how to describe it. You’ve gotta just see the image.”

The source

Mike Adams, standing in for Alex Jones on InfoWars, 13 June 2022, with guests Harrison Smith and Richard Hirschman and an emergency care physician.

(https://www.infowars.com/posts/watch-doctor-shocked-by-epidemic-of-mysterious-clots-found-in-suddenly-deceased-vaccinated-adults/ )

My take on it

Some of the background to this item was covered in my 30 April post which referred to the identification of novel material in post-jab cadavers by a US Board-certified embalmer named Richard Hirschman.

Adams takes up the story:

“We have acquired these clots that have been removed from deceased patients who died suddenly. The embalmers have never seen these clots before until the vaccines began to be administered. And the embalmer who provided these to me who is our guest today is Richard Hirsshman.”

The video clip takes 20 minutes to watch. Please invest the time.

If you have already taken the jab, this footage might persuade you not to take any more.

If you haven’t, this footage might confirm you in your precautionary approach.

In a sane and moral world, this footage alone would be enough to stop the mRNA injection program in its tracks.

Those responsible for pursuing and protecting the injection program, whether politicians, bureaucrats or judiciary, need to rate themselves on both criteria, Sanity, and Morality.

Others are rating them meanwhile.

The jab: “Causing large numbers of deaths.”

The statement

“It is beyond any shadow of a doubt, it’s unequivocal, the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths.”

The script in full:

“I’m an epidemiologist and people have asked me, ‘Dr McCullough, Are the vaccines actually causing the deaths?’

The epidemiological construct that we have to go through is called the Bradford Hill Tenets of Causality. 

So the first question is, Is it a large epidemiological signal? And I tell you, it’s astronomical.  All the vaccines combined in the United States per year it’s no more than 150 deaths, not temporally related.  Here we have over 21,00 deaths so clearly it’s a massive signal.

Number Two:  Is there a dangerous mechanism of action? The answer is Yes we know the vaccines have a dangerous mechanism of action.  They install production of the spike protein. The spike protein is what makes the respiratory infection lethal, and it follows that in some people excessive production of the spike protein in a vulnerable person would be lethal after a vaccine.

The third criteria (sic):  Is it internally consistent?  Are there other conditions that are now acknowledged that they themselves could be fatal?  And the answer is Sure, with mycoarditis our FDA agrees, all the regulatory experts agree that the vaccines cause myocarditis. Can it be fatal?  Yes.  Have there been fatal cases published?  Yes, by Verma and Choi as an example.  Those are publications.   There are over 200 peer-reviewed publications of myocarditis.  How about other forms of death? Vaccine-induced thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombosis, blood clots, stroke, hypertension, myocardial infarction, a variety of other lethal syndromes. There is over a thousand peer-reviewed papers published on fatal and non fatal outcomes.  So that criteria (sic) is met.  So it is internally consistent.

Is it externally consistent? So is it consistent with the Yellow Card system, the Eudra system and the US VAERS system?

And finally, is it temporally related?  Yes, it is very tightly temporally related:

Here we have two separate analyses, one by Rose, one by McLachlan, independent analyses.  US VAERS data.  Fifty percent of these deaths occur within 48 hours, eighty percent within a week.

So I have just gone through the exercise.  It is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths.  It’s unequivocal.  And I’m a card-carrying epidemiologist.  I’m telling you, the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths.”

The source

Dr Peter McCullough, Bitchute, 1 April 2022)

(https://www.bitchute.com/video/SKOGVIZ20GDu/ )

My take on it

Dr McCullough should need no introduction. If you have done any serious information search of your own about independent subject matter experts in the Covid space, you will know who he is.

The Bradford Hills Tenets of Causality may be new to you; but the idea of causality should not be. If something (which we may call A) happens, and then later something else (which we will call B) happens, we may be interested to know if B just happened to occur subsequent to A; or whether B was actually caused by A; or whether both A and B were caused by something else entirely (C).

Dr McCullough refers to multiple systems established for the reporting of adverse events following administration of vaccines (ie they are ‘associated’ with the administration of vaccines). The whole point of such systems is that because they occur in association with the administration of a vaccine, they are prima facie suggestive of causation, and invite investigation in order to confirm or dismiss causation as the case may be. The Bradford Hill Tenets of Causality are the appropriate investigative method.

In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration publishes a Covid Vaccine Weekly Safety Report on adverse events (including deaths) associated with the jab. The TGA’s latest such Report (2 June 2022) indicates that there have been 878 deaths following (ie associated with) administration of the jab, of which the TGA maintains that just 11 were caused by the injection. As far as I am aware the TGA has yet to conduct and publish a causation analysis equivalent to what Dr McCullough and some others have conducted, and that might lend support to the TGA’s counter-intuitive conclusions. Neither have post-mortems been required by default, and the results published, despite the trial nature and novel composition of these controversial injections.

Covid: A pandemic of the vaccinated?

The statement

“Could it be that Australia’s Covid story has morphed into a pandemic of the vaccinated?

So I checked out the Commonwealth Department of Health’s coronavirus website, but it too, while providing all manner of details on Covid statistics by age, sex, states etc, was conspicuously silent on the relationship between Covid cases, hospitalisations and deaths on the one hand, and vaccination status (unvaccinated, single dose, double dose, boosters) on the other. …..

The NSW Respiratory Surveillance Report for the week ending 14 May offered the answers I was looking for. In this ‘epidemiological week 19’, there were 570 Covid cases admitted to hospital, 58 in ICU and 90 deaths (Figure 4). Of these, just 30, 34 and 17 per cent, respectively, were unvaccinated (or vaccination status unknown).

Conversely, fully 82 per cent of all Covid-related deaths in the state in this week were at least double vaccinated, including 64 per cent who had received boosters.

Figure 4

And still the conspiracy of silence continues among all state and federal governments about this disappointing failure of vaccine efficacy and lack of justification for vaccine mandates and passports.

There never was any ethical justification for vaccine coercion to begin with.

And clearly the regulators, health authorities and governments are stubbornly refusing to entertain, let alone scrutinise, the current data coming in for the pandemic, either by accelerated loss of efficacy or by weakening natural immunity with successive doses.

The source

Professor Ramesh Thakur, in Australian Spectator

(https://spectator.com.au/2022/05/is-this-what-success-looks-like/ )

Ramesh Thakur, Emeritus Professor at the Australian National University and former Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations, is based in Australia.  

My take on it

Table 4 above includes a category for No dose/Unknown. It is a pity that this category was not further divided, because in an exercise to determine association, No dose and Unknown are very different categories. If they had been so divided, I would have been inclined to do the analysis on a reduced sample size after excluding the Unknown.

The best I can do is to exclude the bundled category, thereby reducing the sample size to 399.

The table then looks like this:

Would someone like to run a regression analysis on those numbers for me?

But is there any need?

Professor Thakur calls out ‘the conspiracy of silence (that) continues among all state and federal governments about this disappointing failure of vaccine efficacy and lack of justification for vaccine mandates and passports.’

‘A disappointing failure of vaccine efficacy’ ???

This wording implies that the virus remains the villain.

What I and others observe rather is a conspiracy of silence about the toxic nature of this injection.