The jab: See the real US injury data for yourself

The statement

“V-safe is a new smartphone-based CDC program that allows users to register after getting a Covid-19 vaccine and provide health check-ins. …..

After suing the CDC twice, and following months of legal wrangling, the CDC finally capitulated, resulting in a court order that required it to produce this data.  The first batch of data, containing 144 million rows of health entries by v-safe users, has now been obtained by ICAN and you can search it using a user-friendly interface that ICAN worked around the clock to create.”

 

The source

Informed Consent Action Group (ICAN) press release of 3 October 2022

This follows the 15 September announcement by ICAN that the CDC had been ordered by a US District Court to release the v-safe data.

My take on it

See the ugly truth for yourself. Go to this website, enter your email and you get immediate access to ICAN’s Visual Dashboard Interface.

I did. This is what came up:

 

Highlights? (Perhaps the wrong term in these circumstances.)

  • 10,108,273 individuals registered with the voluntary v-safe system and submitted data.
  • 782,913 individuals, or over 7.7% of v-safe users, had a health event requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, and/or hospitalization. 
  • Over 25% had an event that required them to miss school or work and/or prevented normal activities.
  • There were also 71 million reports of symptoms in the pre-populated fields. This is an average of over 7 symptoms reported per v-safe registrant. 

 

Unprecedented vaccine injury.

Why, asks Steve Kirsch, did the CDC hide the v-safe data from the American people for almost 2 years?

We know why.

Everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come into the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.

And they are being exposed, with every new day, both the deeds and the people behind them.

Afterthought: the very label ‘v-safe’ perpetuates the deceit. Why not v-monitor? Or v-track?

The jab: “Measurable risk of events after”

The statement

There is a need for better understanding of the risk of thrombocytopenic, haemorrhagic, thromboembolic disorders following first, second and booster vaccination doses and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Self-controlled cases series analysis of 2.1 million linked patient records in Wales between 7th December 2020 and 31st December 2021. …..

We found that there was a measurable risk of thrombocytopenic, haemorrhagic, thromboembolic events after COVID-19 vaccination and infection.

The source

Nature, Scientific Reports, 30 September 2022 ( https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-20118-6 )

‘Risk of thrombocytopenic, haemorrhagic and thromboembolic disorders following COVID-19 vaccination and positive test: a self-controlled case series analysis in Wales’

My take on it

‘There is a need for better understanding of the risk …’

There is a far greater need, and that need is for action to halt the injection program, immediately, based on what is already known.

I find it interesting that the current Mission Statement of Nature puts itself at the service of scientists first, and the general public second.  The original 1869 version was the reverse:

FIRST, to place before the general public the grand results of Scientific Work and Scientific Discovery; and to urge the claims of Science to a more general recognition in Education and in Daily Life; and

SECONDLY, to aid Scientific men themselves, …

I see a parallel in the attempted inversion to which ‘we the people’ are being subjected by government – government in general, and biocrats in particular.

Which takes us to that famous quote of William Penn:

               ‘Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.’

And here we are.

Mandates: “Sovereignty, as per the ICCPR, is the bedrock of human rights.”

The statement

“At its core, this issue is not about vaccines. It’s not even about Covid-19. This issue is about the
checks and balances which are supposed to measure and mitigate the Government’s uses of
power, particularly when they infringe on individual citizens’ human rights.”

The source

Open letter to the Australian Human Rights Commission’s ‘relatively new’ Commissioner, Lorraine Finlay, from lawyer Peter Fam of Maat’s Method and Julian Gillespie QC. Dated 27 June 2022 https://www.maatsmethod.com.au/post/australian-human-rights-commission-failed-to-perform-their-statutory-function-during-covid-19

My take on it

The letter itself is 14 pages. Exceptional, by any standard. It is well worth the read.

Two Annexures take the total to 314 pages. If evidence mattered, it would be more than enough.

I would describe the document as a chronicle of systemic failures by key agencies and authority figures charged with protecting our health, welfare and personal rights.

Like the authors, and like so many Australians, I await a response that is worthy of the questions raised.

The jab: ‘Disregard everything we’ve said’, says NSW CHO Kerry Chant

The statement

“Disregard anythink (sic) we’ve said about two doses, it’s three doses or more.”

The source

NSW Chief Health Officer Kerry Chant, on 7 NEWS, 5 July 2022

( https://xyz.net.au/2022/07/kerry-chant-goes-nuts-its-3-doses-or-more/ )

My take on it

I suggest that Chant should have stopped after those first four words: “Disregard everything we’ve said.”

The community is learning to do that, some faster than others.