The statement
“Someone needs to hold them accountable and get the data from CMS [The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ] that Stephen Anderson at the CBER Division of the FDA said is where they are going to be pulling what they call Rapid Cycle Analysis every 7 to 10 days from December 14th 2020. They are supposedly pulling reviews every 7 to 10 days of reported symptoms and adverse events to the shots. Have any of you seen any of these? Not one have I ever seen. The cover-up and corruption is insane.”

The source
Dr Bryan Ardis, in panel testimony to a Pennsylvania Senate Hearing on 4 March 2022
https://senatormastriano.com/medicalfreedompanel/ (from 1h13m14s )
My take on it
The transcript of Dr Ardis’ opening remarks is reproduced below for your convenience:
“In 2010 Harvard did a review for three years on VAERS data.
And they actually proclaimed in their document 2010 that less than 1% of all Adverse Events to vaccines were reported to VAERS.
Do you want to know why? They said the Number One reason: doctors didn’t even know it existed, to report injuries to it.
Number Two: they said it got in the way of … the flow of their clinical day. Not only were they going to write down the Adverse Events in their notes; they then had to go sit at a computer and do it secondarily again. So it was just too tedious to take the time to go do that.
That was 10 years ago.
Harvard asked the CDC to allow them to create a program to make it automatic and improve the speed at which it took to report Adverse Events to VAERS nationally.
The CDC took the consultant from Harvard who was assigned for three years, said ‘You no longer can talk to Harvard’, and they never heard from him again.
Six months of waiting. They then published their review, from Harvard, after the CDC refused to help them improve the reporting. That was in 2010, just so you know.
Someone needs to hold them accountable and get the data from CMS [The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] that Stephen Anderson at the CBER Division of the FDA said [on 22 October 2020] is where they are going to be pulling what they call Rapid Cycle Analysis every 7 to 10 days from December 14th 2020. They are supposedly pulling reviews every 7 to 10 days of reported symptoms and adverse events to the shots.
Have any of you seen any of these? Not one have I ever seen. The cover-up and corruption is insane.”
The Harvard VAERS Study referred to by Dr Ardis, the so-called Pilgrim Study, is viewable here: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
It wouldn’t be hard to improve the reporting of adverse events. The technological task is trivial. The lacking ingredient is the will to do it. The motivation, and the incentivisation, and the ignorance, are tilted against us. If medical practitioners were under as much regulatory pressure to report adverse events, as they currently are (in the case of the jab) not to report them, or to hide them, we would all know what is really happening.
Why, after 800-plus deaths in Australia alone following the jab, are we even having this conversation?