The jab: Deaths in the working age group up 40%

The statement

The CEO of the OneAmerica insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18-64) was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID. Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was a 40%.

Before the #Covid vaccines, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for people disabled and not able to work, was between 29 and 30 million on an absolute basis for 4 or 5 years. Then in February of 2021 (2 months after the vaccine roll-out started) this number took off, and went to a high of 33.2 million in September of 2022.

Since February of 2021, the disability rate for the employed is up 31%, and the general US population’s disability rate is up 9% from February of 2021 through to December of 2022.

The source

Ed Dowd, industry analyst, quoted by Tucker Carlson (

My take on

Scientific method relies on testing the likelihood of something happening by chance, rather than it happening due to some specific cause.

The numbers that Dowd quotes are off the charts. There is virtually no chance that these excess deaths and injuries happened by chance.

Didn’t someone say that ‘one death is a tragedy; a thousand deaths is a statistic.’ How wrong. How cruel. How symptomatic of those driving this juggernaut.

A thousand deaths is a thousand tragedies, and the ripples spread out from there.

The jab and cancer:  larger, more aggressive, in younger patients …

The statement

“With this experience (see earlier text of article), I know approximately the distribution of average age, tumor size, and degree of malignancy that I can expect in the daily input material of breast cancer.

Already, in Autumn 2021, I had the impression that I was suddenly receiving more material

  1. From younger patients, often 30 to 50 years old.
  2. The tumors were growing more aggressively and faster.
  3. And that they were larger. More than four centimeters was not uncommon. I saw tumors up to 16 centimeters in size in the breast.
  4. I also had the impression that multifocal tumor growth and bilateral tumor growths were more frequent.

My efforts at the second pathology conference in Germany, in December 2021, to find colleagues to help me prove or disprove my hypothesis of Turbo Cancer after vaccination against COVID-19 met with little response.”

The source

Pathologist Ute Kruger MD, in DailyClout, 10 March 2023

My take on it

That’s the conventional medical model for you:  an unnecessary and unsafe treatment that generates side effects that invite further medical intervention – a compounding effect on personal health, and on provider profits.

What’s left to say?  Does the average person have any idea about all this?  How could they, when the communications channels are gagged?

Excess Deaths up 16% for 2022: Hello!!!

The statement

“On December 22nd, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released its latest Provisional Mortality Statistics for 2022. It only covered deaths up to the end of September.

This is what they said:

“In 2022, there were 144,650 deaths that occurred by 30 September and were registered by 30 November, which is 19,986 (16.0%) more than the historical average.”

Is 16% more deaths than average unusual?

You bet it is!

Here’s a graph showing excess deaths (more than the average of the past five years) and reduced deaths (less than the average of the past five years). (See notes at end for detailed information about the graph).

Before the highly anomalous year of 2022, the highest annual increase in deaths was 4.4%, which occurred in 1964. On average, over the 66 year period, there was an annual 1.6% decrease in deaths.

Download And Share The Graph

Download The Graph Data

With nearly 20,000 more Australians than expected dying in the first two-thirds of 2022 (which is all the data that has been made available to us) we owe it to them and their families to ask questions.

These figures equate to 75 extra deaths a day. That’s like a fully-laden passenger airliner the size of an Airbus 330-300 crashing every four days and all lives being lost.

Perhaps these extra deaths are all due to covid, I hear you suggest.

Well, according to the ABS, 8,439 deaths were due to covid by 30th September.

Of course, we must ask questions about these 8,439 extra deaths ascribed to covid. The ABS does not report how many of these people who died ‘due to covid’ had received the covid injections, which have been claimed to protect against severe illness and death.

If thousands of fully vaccinated Australians died from covid in 2022, we need to know. It would call into question what we have been told about the vaccines’ effectiveness. We can’t just assume the vaccines are working. We need proof.

What is clear from the ABS data, however, is that, over and above these deaths from covid, a lot more Australians were dying in 2022 than usual. Almost 11,500 people by September.

That figure is more than the number of people reported as dying from covid. It’s the equivalent of the airliner mentioned previously crashing every week.”

The source

Clarity on Health ( ) quoting ABS statistics released 22 December 2022

My take on it

When Clive Palmer first called the TGA to account for the deaths associated with (ie following, or ‘linked to’) the jab, the number was 210. It is now 973.

The ABS data indicate jab-associated deaths that are an order of magnitude higher.

I point you to Article 113 of the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice:

Any sentinel or look-out who is found drunk or sleeping upon his post, or leaves it before he is regularly relieved, shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the offense is committed at any other time, by such punishment other than death as a court-martial may direct.

The TGA can hardly claim to have just dozed off. Rather it has refused repeated calls to arouse itself and alert those in peril. Meanwhile the deaths and injuries continue to pile up in evidence against it.

The jab: “Causing large numbers of deaths.”

The statement

“It is beyond any shadow of a doubt, it’s unequivocal, the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths.”

The script in full:

“I’m an epidemiologist and people have asked me, ‘Dr McCullough, Are the vaccines actually causing the deaths?’

The epidemiological construct that we have to go through is called the Bradford Hill Tenets of Causality. 

So the first question is, Is it a large epidemiological signal? And I tell you, it’s astronomical.  All the vaccines combined in the United States per year it’s no more than 150 deaths, not temporally related.  Here we have over 21,00 deaths so clearly it’s a massive signal.

Number Two:  Is there a dangerous mechanism of action? The answer is Yes we know the vaccines have a dangerous mechanism of action.  They install production of the spike protein. The spike protein is what makes the respiratory infection lethal, and it follows that in some people excessive production of the spike protein in a vulnerable person would be lethal after a vaccine.

The third criteria (sic):  Is it internally consistent?  Are there other conditions that are now acknowledged that they themselves could be fatal?  And the answer is Sure, with mycoarditis our FDA agrees, all the regulatory experts agree that the vaccines cause myocarditis. Can it be fatal?  Yes.  Have there been fatal cases published?  Yes, by Verma and Choi as an example.  Those are publications.   There are over 200 peer-reviewed publications of myocarditis.  How about other forms of death? Vaccine-induced thrombocytopenic purpura, thrombosis, blood clots, stroke, hypertension, myocardial infarction, a variety of other lethal syndromes. There is over a thousand peer-reviewed papers published on fatal and non fatal outcomes.  So that criteria (sic) is met.  So it is internally consistent.

Is it externally consistent? So is it consistent with the Yellow Card system, the Eudra system and the US VAERS system?

And finally, is it temporally related?  Yes, it is very tightly temporally related:

Here we have two separate analyses, one by Rose, one by McLachlan, independent analyses.  US VAERS data.  Fifty percent of these deaths occur within 48 hours, eighty percent within a week.

So I have just gone through the exercise.  It is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths.  It’s unequivocal.  And I’m a card-carrying epidemiologist.  I’m telling you, the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths.”

The source

Dr Peter McCullough, Bitchute, 1 April 2022)

( )

My take on it

Dr McCullough should need no introduction. If you have done any serious information search of your own about independent subject matter experts in the Covid space, you will know who he is.

The Bradford Hills Tenets of Causality may be new to you; but the idea of causality should not be. If something (which we may call A) happens, and then later something else (which we will call B) happens, we may be interested to know if B just happened to occur subsequent to A; or whether B was actually caused by A; or whether both A and B were caused by something else entirely (C).

Dr McCullough refers to multiple systems established for the reporting of adverse events following administration of vaccines (ie they are ‘associated’ with the administration of vaccines). The whole point of such systems is that because they occur in association with the administration of a vaccine, they are prima facie suggestive of causation, and invite investigation in order to confirm or dismiss causation as the case may be. The Bradford Hill Tenets of Causality are the appropriate investigative method.

In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration publishes a Covid Vaccine Weekly Safety Report on adverse events (including deaths) associated with the jab. The TGA’s latest such Report (2 June 2022) indicates that there have been 878 deaths following (ie associated with) administration of the jab, of which the TGA maintains that just 11 were caused by the injection. As far as I am aware the TGA has yet to conduct and publish a causation analysis equivalent to what Dr McCullough and some others have conducted, and that might lend support to the TGA’s counter-intuitive conclusions. Neither have post-mortems been required by default, and the results published, despite the trial nature and novel composition of these controversial injections.