Despite COVID getting the greatest media attention of any event since World War II, the latest data from a respected statistics website shows that, globally, the number of deaths from all causes for 2020 was no higher than expected, given previous years’ totals. In addition, the annual world death rate per one thousand in population has been steadily declining since 1950, from 20 per thousand in 1950, to 7.6 per thousand in 2020, the same as in 2019. …
The data shows that total world deaths from all causes held steady at about 58.8 million per year since 2019. In 2017 the total was 58.7 million. If anything, global deaths were lower than expected last year, due to aging Baby Boomer demographics, which accounts for a slight, normal rise in deaths in most years.
In global terms, if excess deaths are the criteria, there was no pandemic.
“An explosive new study on the origins of COVID-19 pandemic claims researchers found ‘unique fingerprints’ in samples of the virus that they say could only have arisen from manipulation in a lab – supporting theories that it escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.”
This article refers to a new 22-page paper authored by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen set to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery.
My take on it
Does this qualify as News? In my own case, only because it refers to a new study.
More than a year ago eminent scientists were reporting that foreign insertions could be clearly identified in the native gene sequences. Dr Judy Mikovits, if I recall correctly, was one.
The original Gain of Function research (‘purposive manipulation’), the release of the virus and the endeavour by WRI to cover its tracks, are in my view very disappointing, but hardly “shocking allegations”. I wish they were.
According to the article, “the majority of experts have until recently staunchly denied the origins of COVID-19 were anything other than a natural infection leaping from animals to humans.”
Which takes me back to something my father said to me: ‘If ever you find yourself in the majority, get down on your knees and examine your conscience.’
A majority vote never made anything true. Pick your sources and your experts wisely.
Nor indeed do I accept that the majority of experts held the view claimed in the article. Certainly it has been the official narrative, as choreographed and jealously guarded by government, biocrats and the media. That barrier to the free flow of information has simply served to delay and frustrate the fruits of independent enquiry. This paper is just one evidence of that.
‘As the American colonists suffered under British tyranny for many years before the breaking point at Concord, so have American citizens today suffered at the hands of their own government. They, like their forefathers, have demonstrated incredible patience even as that patience has work thin.
Americans are patient no longer. They are standing up, asserting their rights, pushing back, and making clear they will no longer comply. The oligarchs may have in mind that they can simply continue this tyranny forever with masks, social distancing, and most hideously of all vaccines.
They cannot. The revolution has begun. There may or may not ever be a statue of the woman at Target as there is of the Minuteman in Massachusetts. She is no less significant. Another shot heard round the world has been fired.’
And Magazine is new to me. I have become aware of it because of this article, which I came across on Telegram.
The article impressed me, for both its reasoning and its tone. It chronicles some of the key propositions cited without scientific merit by both government and corporates in support of ineffectual and indeed harmful policy responses to Covid-19.
Beyond that it testifies to the power of a lone voice, informed of its rights. Very much in the spirit of Solzhenitsyn’s ‘Live Not by Lies’
If you appreciate common sense and common courtesy, and inspiration, you will enjoy the read.
“Ralph Lorigo is the lawyer who now has won three court orders forcing New York hospitals to administer Ivermectin to dying patients. Incredibly, these three hospitals and their lawyers fought against the patients, arguing they did not have the right to receive the drug despite a valid prescription written by their doctors. In essence, the argument was that they did not have the right to try a potentially life-saving medication.
In each of the three cases, the New York State Supreme Court Justices sided with the patient, and in each of the three cases, the patients made near-miraculous recoveries after the Ivermectin was given. In each case, these patients were in the Intensive Care Unit on ventilators, unable to breathe on their own, and universally, after the drug was given, they rapidly improved and were able to breathe on their own.”
Justus R Hope, MD, writing in The Desert Review, 19 April 2021
If you had never heard of Ivermectin before you read this article, it alone should suffice to alert you that the official narrative is suspect, and that powerful forces are behind that narrative.
Dr Hope mentions that some commentators have chosen to ridicule Ivermection by categorising it purely as a treatment for animals. Sadly some panelists on the ABC’s Insiders program have done exactly that, speaking of it as ‘discredited’. Truth is the first casualty of war. But at what cost is such a lie perpetuated?