The jab: Federal agency approval unsupportable

‘Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.’

‘COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign’, peer-reviewed paper by M. Nathaniel Mead • Stephanie Seneff • Russ Wolfinger • Jessica Rose • Kris Denhaerynck • Steve Kirsch • Peter A. McCullough

(https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052#!/ 24 January 2024

What’s left to say?

Let him who has ears, let him hear.

The evidence cries out for a moratorium.

The jab: “two-foot blood clots”

“Yesterday, I saw patients with 2-foot blood clots in their legs after the vaccine.Injecting people with the genetic code for the lethal spike protein is the most dangerous proposition our government agencies could have ever put forward to our country. … The Covid-19 vaccines should be removed from the market. They’re not safe for human use.”

World-renowned cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough, giving Congressional testimony on 12 January 2024

https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/dr-mccullough-reveals-disturbing

The evidence mounts, and the testimony mounts, against this engineered bioweapon: unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe.

And the toll of injury and death continues to mount meanwhile.

We are way past the point of willful ignorance, of plausible deniability. We have erred, not on the side of caution but on the side of intolerable risk

Please God we are approaching the point where light will dispell the darkness, and the protagonists will be laid bare.

“Nothing is hidden, all is laid bare, before the eyes of Him to whom we must give an account. (Hebs 4:13)

The jab:  Is it driving the 386% increase in airline mayday calls?

“What is causing steep rise of in-flight medical emergencies since 2021?

SQUAWK 7700 is the airline radio code that indicates a serious issue onboard the aircraft. It can be input by pilots or instructed by Air Traffic Control, and it alerts controllers and ground crew to prepare for the arrival of the aircraft.

I pulled the chart from a report detailing an inquiry conducted by veteran Virgin Australia Capt. Shane Murdock, who was fired from Virgin for refusing the COVID-19 shots. Captain Murdock who also gave a fascinating interview with reporter Charles Kovess on TNT Radio.

The dramatic increase of SQUAWK 7700 codes since 2022 was apparently compiled by a bot set up by the X account @GCFlightAlerts. It posts when a pilot squawks 7700 anywhere in the world.

Between 2018, and 2019, the mayday average was 29.1 per cent of all distress calls. During 2022, mayday calls increased by 272 per cent. In the first three months of 2023, the increase was 386 per cent. The graph shows there was an instant, steep increase when the vaccines were mandated to pilots.

Obviously Captain Murdock’s research should be the subject of a massive, international inquiry conducted by official aviation regulators.

Large commercial airliners are always flown by a Captain and First Officer. If one of them has a cardiac issue in flight, the other pilot can (in theory) fly the plane. Nevertheless, the stunning increase in mayday calls should be rigorously scrutinized.

Is this alarming trend juke a fluke or gross overstatement? How many of these Code 7700s are for medical emergencies on board, and how many are a result of mechanical issues? Was the supply chain for aircraft spare parts and electronics disrupted during the pandemic, resulting in an increase in mechanical glitches?

I strongly welcome reader feedback about this story. Is Captain Murdock the only airline industry veteran who is talking about this?”

John Leake and Dr Peter McCullough, on Substack

( https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/airline-mayday-radio-calls-up-386?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=138944312&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=emrmi&utm_medium=email )

See also https://cairnsnews.org/2023/11/22/airlines-will-lose-passengers-if-they-listen-to-what-this-commercial-pilot-says-about-mrna-medical-episodes-in-the-air/

It’s a fair question, is it not? What is causing the steep rise of in-flight medical emergencies since 2021?

Yet again, the significance of this preliminary information, and the scale of incidence, call for immediate and thorough investigation by appropriate parties, which might reasonably include the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Air Services Australia, airline operators, and insurance companies, to name a few.

Yet again, some basic data analysis would tell us a lot more than we know now.

Yet again, if anything conflicts with the official narrative on ‘safe and effective’, we cannot expect it to be given the scrutiny and disclosure it deserves.

So, the question for all you air travellers is, Do you feel lucky?

The jab:  “a full ventilation of all the facts”

The statement

FASA (the Freedom Alliance of South Africa, AD) has approached the High Court in Pretoria, South Africa, to review and set aside the authorisation of Pfizer’s vaccine products on the basis that the authorisation was irrational and unlawful.  If successful this will result in the removal of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines from the domestic market.  The case is under the custodianship of Advocate Erin-Dianne Richards, briefed by Daniel Eloff of Hurter Spies.  The lawyers explain the significance of the case:  “FASA’s aim is to subject the South African regulator’s decision to judicial scrutiny.  They argue that the regulator’s decision was based on flawed and inaccurate trial data analysis presented by a heavily conflicted Pfizer, and that it is therefore legally invalid.  Their aim is not only to ensure legal compliance – but to set precedent requiring a higher level of statutory scrutiny in the case of future vaccine authorisations in the interest of public health.  Whatever the decision of the Court, this case is important.  While it has arguably been possible to suppress and distort facts in the public narrative either for or against the vaccines, this will not be possible before our Courts.  This case will see a full ventilation of all relevant facts pertaining to South Africa’s authorisation of the Pfizer vaccines.”

The source

Dr Aseem Malhotra (@DrAseemMalhotra), eminent UK cardiologist, in a tweet ( https://twitter.com/DrAseemMalhotra/status/1641322215143530497 )

See also https://theprint.in/world/british-indian-medic-backs-legal-review-of-covid-vaccine-in-south-africa-high-court/1482252/

The application was lodged on 23 March 2023.

My take on it

Dr Malhotra, who is a co-applicant, recognises that that this case has significance beyond South Africa:

“South Africa’s Constitution and its Constitutional jurisprudence has motivated, inspired and led the World.  My personal hope is that here, too, the South African judiciary will lead the way towards a global rectification of a serious injustice.”

I share his hope, and I pray that it is so.  To date it would seem to me that courts in other jurisdictions have flown in the face of reason to find ways of avoiding “a full ventilation of the facts”.

But Why ?