The statement

‘We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substanti
ation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, ne
cessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.’

The source

Grok 3 beta, Jonathan Cohler, David Legates, Franklin Soon, Willie Soon (2025), A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions, Science of Climate Change (Microsoft Word – SCC-Grok 3-Review-V5-1c3.docx )

My take on it

In a press release co-author Cohler said that ‘this marks a historic milestone: to the best of current knowledge, it’s the first peer-reviewed climate science paper with an AI system as the lead author.’

Another nail in the coffin of the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis.

But while we wait for rigor mortis, the consequences of this erroneous hypothesis continue to play out in irresponsible and unsustainable energy policies that are taking Australia to the same destination as Germany – industrial, economic and social collapse.