The statement

“All of my comments were ignored without even a rebuttal. At that point, I concluded that the IPCC Reports were actually intended to be advocacy documents designed to produce particular policy actions, but not a true and honest assessment of the understanding of the climate system.”

The source

Dr Roger Pielke, one of 46 former IPCC contributors quoted in Electroverse.info, 28 May 2024 (Warmth Is Good; + 46 ‘Climate Change Denying’ Statements Made By Former IPCC Scientists – Electroverse )

My take on it

If ever there was a government policy area that cried out for truth, it is the claim of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming.

On that basis I encourage you to read the other 45 comments.

Taken collectively, they reflect three things:

• that the modelling relied upon by IPCC is flawed

• that the policy position held by IPCC is not supported by the scientific evidence
  
  
• that the official narrative is impervious to honest scientific enquiry.

The article finishes with a quote. The quote reflects that truth is of no concern here: