‘Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.’
FASA (the Freedom Alliance of South Africa, AD) has approached the High Court in Pretoria, South Africa, to review and set aside the authorisation of Pfizer’s vaccine products on the basis that the authorisation was irrational and unlawful. If successful this will result in the removal of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines from the domestic market. The case is under the custodianship of Advocate Erin-Dianne Richards, briefed by Daniel Eloff of Hurter Spies. The lawyers explain the significance of the case: “FASA’s aim is to subject the South African regulator’s decision to judicial scrutiny. They argue that the regulator’s decision was based on flawed and inaccurate trial data analysis presented by a heavily conflicted Pfizer, and that it is therefore legally invalid. Their aim is not only to ensure legal compliance – but to set precedent requiring a higher level of statutory scrutiny in the case of future vaccine authorisations in the interest of public health. Whatever the decision of the Court, this case is important. While it has arguably been possible to suppress and distort facts in the public narrative either for or against the vaccines, this will not be possible before our Courts. This case will see a full ventilation of all relevant facts pertaining to South Africa’s authorisation of the Pfizer vaccines.”
Dr Malhotra, who is a co-applicant, recognises that that this case has significance beyond South Africa:
“South Africa’s Constitution and its Constitutional jurisprudence has motivated, inspired and led the World. My personal hope is that here, too, the South African judiciary will lead the way towards a global rectification of a serious injustice.”
I share his hope, and I pray that it is so. To date it would seem to me that courts in other jurisdictions have flown in the face of reason to find ways of avoiding “a full ventilation of the facts”.
“Matt Hancock should be arrested for wilful misconduct in public office. The slithy tove can – and must – be dragged before a Select Committee and made to answer for his actions and the vast hurt they have caused.”
(Matt Handcock is the former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.)
The UK Telegraph, viewed today; quoted by NaturalNews.com, cited by Martin Geddes on Telegram, 15 March 2023)
I just hope that it’s true. According to the Telegraph, “Award-winning journalist Allison Pearson is a columnist and the chief interviewer of the Daily Telegraph.”
Question: What has prompted this headline, against the tide?
Answer: “The Telegraph has obtained more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages between Matt Hancock and other ministers and officials at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. … For eight days now, The Telegraph has published the most breathtakingly damning stories about the misuse of power (and “science”) by Matt Hancock and his cabal during the pandemic.”
“The Telegraph has obtained …” I love that well-worn phrase. And I thank God for leaks and for whistleblowers who bring light and fresh air where it’s needed. Suddenly the obvious conclusions may now be spoken out – that the UK’s former Health Minister is only an individual after all, despite all that power; that he has abused that power in a most egregious way; and that justice cries out for him and his lackeys to be brought to fair trial for wilful misconduct in public office.
The CEO of the OneAmerica insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18-64) was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID. Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was a 40%.
Before the #Covid vaccines, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics for people disabled and not able to work, was between 29 and 30 million on an absolute basis for 4 or 5 years. Then in February of 2021 (2 months after the vaccine roll-out started) this number took off, and went to a high of 33.2 million in September of 2022.
Since February of 2021, the disability rate for the employed is up 31%, and the general US population’s disability rate is up 9% from February of 2021 through to December of 2022.
Ed Dowd, industry analyst, quoted by Tucker Carlson (https://t.me/DowdEdward/2569)
My take on
Scientific method relies on testing the likelihood of something happening by chance, rather than it happening due to some specific cause.
The numbers that Dowd quotes are off the charts. There is virtually no chance that these excess deaths and injuries happened by chance.
Didn’t someone say that ‘one death is a tragedy; a thousand deaths is a statistic.’ How wrong. How cruel. How symptomatic of those driving this juggernaut.
A thousand deaths is a thousand tragedies, and the ripples spread out from there.