‘The jab’ : 50,000 dead already in the US?

The comment

“We have now a whistleblower inside the CMS*, and we have two whistleblowers in the CDC**. We think we have 50,000 dead Americans. Fifty thousand deaths. So we actually have more deaths due to the vaccine per day than certainly the viral illness by far. It’s basically propagandized bioterrorism by injection.”

                                *CMS:  (US) Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services

                                **CDC: (US) Centres for Disease Control

The source

Dr Peter McCullough, in a June 11 webinar with German attorney Reiner Fuellmich and several other doctors.  (Yes, that was over a month ago.)

( https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/06/27/dr-peter-mccullough-whistleblowers-inside-cdc-claim-injections-have-already-killed-50000-americans )

Dr McCullough is professor of medicine and vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University and also teaches at Texas A&M University. He is an epidemiologist, cardiologist and internist and has testified before the Texas State Senate related to COVID-19 treatments. He holds the distinction of being the most widely cited physician in the treatment of COVID-19 with more than 600 citations in the National Library of Medicine.

My take on it

I thank God for whistle-blowers.  I have been praying for them to multiply, and it is happening.

Listen, you that have ears to hear with.

By any measure, Dr McCullough has credibility. And he is calling out the medical establishment as complicit.

The first step is for each individual to get past the understandable cognitive dissonance, and accept that this high crime is actually happening, in plain sight. The linked article above takes less than 5 minutes to read.  Please read it.

Then comes the natural question Why? 

The obvious answers aren’t pretty. Ignorance is the kindest candidate.

But while you are conjecturing, people are being harmed, on a massive scale.

Is it not more urgent to interrupt the roll-out of this toxic injectable gene therapy?  McCullough and Fuellmich are working on that, along with thousands of others.  Including me.

Silence is acquiescence.

What pandemic? “No excess deaths from all causes globally in 2020”

The statement

Despite COVID getting the greatest media attention of any event since World War II, the latest data from a respected statistics website shows that, globally, the number of deaths from all causes for 2020 was no higher than expected, given previous years’ totals. In addition, the annual world death rate per one thousand in population has been steadily declining since 1950, from 20 per thousand in 1950, to 7.6 per thousand in 2020, the same as in 2019.  …

The data shows that total world deaths from all causes held steady at about 58.8 million per year since 2019. In 2017 the total was 58.7 million. If anything, global deaths were lower than expected last year, due to aging Baby Boomer demographics, which accounts for a slight, normal rise in deaths in most years.

In global terms, if excess deaths are the criteria, there was no pandemic.

The source

Corona Virus News, 9 June 2021


My take on it

At the outset some people were suspicious as to whether overall deaths would substantiate the doomsday claims.  With the passage of time the numbers are in.  They confirm the original suspicion.

The tragedy is that an orchestrated fear campaign has had its effect.   

‘The jab’: UK deaths expected to be dominated by the double-dosers

The Statement

“The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.”


The source

UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, 5 April 2021



My take on it

Sources are important.  That’s why I routinely reference them.  I note that the SPI-M-O paper is to be read in conjunction with three other sources of modelling, one of which is the University College London.  Others have had much to say about the original predictions from that source, and also about blatant conflicts of interest.

Moving on, …

it is surely staggering that an expected 70% of deaths will be of people who have had two doses of the ‘vaccine’.  Whatever this injection may claimedly have done for others will be of small comfort to those thus affected.

The expected results reported here are attributed to a high level of uptake in the most at risk demographic; and are explained as ‘vaccination failure’.  If the administration of the injection is weighted toward this group, and if the deaths are similarly weighted, then one might reasonably ask, as a ‘first effect’ whether the vaccine itself might be in some way contributory.

 If, ‘in the most at-risk age groups, immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals’, at what point should we expect this finding to be reflected in updated health advisories?

Covid illness results in lifelong immunity

The statement

“People who had mild COVID-19 have long-lasting antibody protection, according to a study by researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.   …..

“Last fall, there were reports that antibodies wane quickly after infection with the virus that causes COVID-19, and mainstream media interpreted that to mean that immunity was not long-lived,” said Ali Ellebedy, senior author of the study and an associate professor of pathology & immunology at Washington University.

“But that’s a misinterpretation of the data. It’s normal for antibody levels to go down after acute infection, but they don’t go down to zero; they plateau. Here, we found antibody-producing cells in people 11 months after first symptoms. These cells will live and produce antibodies for the rest of people’s lives. That’s strong evidence for long-lasting immunity,” he added.’

The source

Meiling Lee, The Epoch Times, 1 June 2021

( https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/research-suggests-mild-covid-19-illness-leaves-behind-lasting-antibody-protection_3840082.html )

The research paper itself was published online in Nature on 24 May 2021 ( https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03647-4_reference.pdf )

My take on it.

No kidding.

If you were to ask a competent immunologist what happens normally in the advent of a viral infection, this is what you would have been told.  These researchers are simply saying that SARS-CoV-2 has proved to be no different from what happens normally.

It is reasonable to ask why this was not the starting assumption for the formation of a public policy response.  Eminent individuals certainly made that point at the time.  Professor Cahill, if I recall correctly, was one.

It is reasonable to ask why this norm is still not informing public policy.

Again the question is Why?

And while we muse, the human immune system, perhaps our greatest personal asset, is under assault world-wide from a gene therapy injection program that is at best ill-conceived, and at worst malign.  The human body is a lot smarter than any government.   But it is not impregnable.