Geoengineering: So You STILL Believe It’s A Conspiracy Theory?

The statement

“A typical chemtrail first appears as a white line high in the sky emitted by a large jet airplane. These lines become diffuse as they float down to earth. Heavy spraying creates a thick haze over vast areas. Chemtrails often form Xs and sometimes grid patterns. Chemtrails are also sometimes sprayed in a circular fashion. Although seemingly endless amounts of photos and videos are posted online, you can observe these phenomena with your own eyes. One just needs to look up.

The source

So you STILL Believe It’s a Conspiracy Theory, an article by Peter Kirby posted by Steve Allen on thinkaboutit.online on 1 June 2022

My take on it

Yup.

I’ve looked up. The photos below were taken by me within recent months, in northern Sydney and on the Central Coast. You are free to go on thinking they are natural if you like.

For me they raise obvious questions: Who? And Why?

As for How, I refer you to another article catalogued under Geoengineering on the same website, Weather as a Weapon of Mass Destruction (by Steve Allen on 15 September 2017). If you were doubting the technological possibilities and the widespread real-world applications, this should be enough to set you straight.

The jab: Dr Kerryn Phelps becomes a witness against

The comment

Former federal MP Dr Kerryn Phelps has revealed she and her wife both suffered serious and ongoing injures from Covid vaccines, while suggesting the true rate of adverse events is far higher than acknowledged due to under-reporting and “threats” from medical regulators.

In an explosive submission to Parliament’s Long Covid inquiry, the former Australian Medical Association (AMA) president has broken her silence about the “devastating” experience — emerging as the most prominent public health figure in the country to speak up about the taboo subject.

“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation,” the 65-year-old said.

“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation. …..

“Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration,” she said.

The source

Frank Chung, news.com.au, 20 December 2022

(https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/ask-ahpra-dr-kerryn-phelps-doesnt-know-why-regulator-silenced-doctors-on-vaccine-injuries/news-story/a731a655120649f913c8170bfbf1bb96 )

My take on it

“Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation.”

Do tell.

Life has a way of confronting us with the truth, notwithstanding.

The jab: See the real US injury data for yourself

The statement

“V-safe is a new smartphone-based CDC program that allows users to register after getting a Covid-19 vaccine and provide health check-ins. …..

After suing the CDC twice, and following months of legal wrangling, the CDC finally capitulated, resulting in a court order that required it to produce this data.  The first batch of data, containing 144 million rows of health entries by v-safe users, has now been obtained by ICAN and you can search it using a user-friendly interface that ICAN worked around the clock to create.”

 

The source

Informed Consent Action Group (ICAN) press release of 3 October 2022

This follows the 15 September announcement by ICAN that the CDC had been ordered by a US District Court to release the v-safe data.

My take on it

See the ugly truth for yourself. Go to this website, enter your email and you get immediate access to ICAN’s Visual Dashboard Interface.

I did. This is what came up:

 

Highlights? (Perhaps the wrong term in these circumstances.)

  • 10,108,273 individuals registered with the voluntary v-safe system and submitted data.
  • 782,913 individuals, or over 7.7% of v-safe users, had a health event requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, and/or hospitalization. 
  • Over 25% had an event that required them to miss school or work and/or prevented normal activities.
  • There were also 71 million reports of symptoms in the pre-populated fields. This is an average of over 7 symptoms reported per v-safe registrant. 

 

Unprecedented vaccine injury.

Why, asks Steve Kirsch, did the CDC hide the v-safe data from the American people for almost 2 years?

We know why.

Everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come into the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.

And they are being exposed, with every new day, both the deeds and the people behind them.

Afterthought: the very label ‘v-safe’ perpetuates the deceit. Why not v-monitor? Or v-track?

Mandates: “Sovereignty, as per the ICCPR, is the bedrock of human rights.”

The statement

“At its core, this issue is not about vaccines. It’s not even about Covid-19. This issue is about the
checks and balances which are supposed to measure and mitigate the Government’s uses of
power, particularly when they infringe on individual citizens’ human rights.”

The source

Open letter to the Australian Human Rights Commission’s ‘relatively new’ Commissioner, Lorraine Finlay, from lawyer Peter Fam of Maat’s Method and Julian Gillespie QC. Dated 27 June 2022 https://www.maatsmethod.com.au/post/australian-human-rights-commission-failed-to-perform-their-statutory-function-during-covid-19

My take on it

The letter itself is 14 pages. Exceptional, by any standard. It is well worth the read.

Two Annexures take the total to 314 pages. If evidence mattered, it would be more than enough.

I would describe the document as a chronicle of systemic failures by key agencies and authority figures charged with protecting our health, welfare and personal rights.

Like the authors, and like so many Australians, I await a response that is worthy of the questions raised.