Masks for kids: High Court evidence is that risk was never considered

The statement

“At the High Court hearing today, 30 April 2021, it was revealed to the Court that neither the Tapton School Academy Trust (which runs 4 secondary schools) nor the government had conducted any assessment of the risk of harms from requiring children to wear masks in schools.

At the same time the Court received unchallenged evidence that wearing masks could result in causing pulmonary fibrosis, being “among the worst diseases that can be suffered or witnessed. It kills exceedingly slowly, by ever-thickening matrix formation, a kind of scar tissue, obstructing the alveoli and reducing their air exchange. The illness worsens over time, and suffocates the victim very gradually. Nothing is available to the sufferer from conventional medicine.”     

Also unchallenged was evidence of psychological harm suffered by children because of the pressure upon them to wear masks and the need to conform to the authority of teachers and their peers.

Against this background, the child (whose name and school remain subject to a Court anonymity order) asked the Court for an order stopping the school encouraging mask-wearing by children.

Roger Ter Haar QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) has reserved his judgment but indicated he expects to provide his decision in writing by next Wednesday 05 May 2021.”

The source

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-masks-in-schools/?fbclid=IwAR34LpFj2fl_YadkzaJa0Y9zLd76_rTs0k_Q6dpQ-43OyCKKI5oiFIsFT1I

My take on it

Tapton Secondary School is located in the UK, so I gather that this action is proceeding in the High Court of England and Wales.

I have my own view as to the wisdom of wearing masks in response to Covid.  Those views have been formed by examining some of the arguments and evidence for and against.

Not everyone who does take that approach, reaches the same conclusion as I have.

And of course not everyone takes that evidence-based approach.

The question is, Should we expect that evidence-based approach from government?

Of course we should.

And should we expect that evidence-based approach of those who are entrusted with the care of our children, and specifically of schools and teachers  – in loco parentis?

Of course we should.

To me it is unsurprising that an institution such as a school should just follow government guidelines unquestioningly.  I witnessed the same attitude early last year when I contacted aged care institutions in Australia in an effort to forestall what I saw coming.  They pointed me to the government.

The government formally holds that trust.  The government is all the more responsible for weighing the evidence for and against any policy; of assessing the impact.  The evidence is that in this case the UK government did not.

That is a breach of trust. 

The Covid ‘jab’: “a stunningly high ratio of deaths to vaccinations” goes unchallenged

The statement

“Reporting a death requires a healthcare worker to enter it into the system,” he said. And if the death does not occur within the normal 15-minute monitoring period they often go unreported. Most deaths occur within 72 hours of the shot. “They pile up on day one, two and three,” he said.

As a matter of comparison: There are 20 to 30 deaths reported every year to VAERS related to the flu shot. That’s with 195 million receiving flu shots. Compare that to the COVID shot, which resulted in 2,602 reported deaths through 77 million vaccinations.

That’s a stunningly high ratio of deaths to vaccinations, the highest for any vaccine in U.S. history, and yet no major media outlet has launched an investigation. Independent journalists and researchers such as Alex Newman, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Leo Hohmann have been ruthlessly censored.”

The Source

Dr Peter McCullough.  Dr McCullough holds the honour of being the most cited medical doctor on COVID-19 treatments at the National Library of Medicine, with more than 600 citations. He has testified before Congress and won numerous awards during his distinguished medical career.

( https://leohohmann.com/2021/04/30/highly-cited-covid-doctor-comes-to-stunning-conclusion-govt-scrubbing-unprecedented-numbers-of-injection-related-deaths/ )

My take on it

Yet again the evidence indicates that what is extraordinary about Covid-19 is not so much the disease itself, but the policy response of government in general, and of biocrats in particular.  In this case it is that the adverse effects threshold that would normally have interrupted the use of these vaccines much earlier, has been dramatically raised.  Perhaps even set aside.

And yet again the media are complicit in not calling out that policy response as exceptional.

Which is pretty much what many of us have come to expect.

But not to accept.

Covid: “Nobody needs to be dying from this disease.”

The statement

“I would not say we have a pandemic.  I would say this disease has become endemic. …

It’s not the scary disease that everybody is making it to be, and it has effective treatment, and effective prevention.   …

We use hydroxychloroquine, ivermection, and we use ?azithromycin, and we make sure they take vitamin C, D, zinc … I think one of the biggest problems we’re having is the vitamin D deficiency, so make sure they get a booster of vitamin D.   …

This disease is very manageable, it is easy to treat.  ….

They are censoring us because we are saying the truth.  They don’t want to treat people, they want to sell vaccines.  I think this whole pandemic was made for the vaccine ?industry, and not the other way around.  I just wish people would wake up, and realise that.   …

Covid has effective treatment, and effective prevention .   Nobody needs to be dying from this disease.  We said that from Day One, and it is still true.”

The source

Dr Stella Immanuel, a primary care physician at the Rehoboth Medical Centre in Houston, Texas. 

https://rumble.com/vfqkcp-houston-doctor-successfully-treated-over-20k-patients-with-hydroxychloroqui.html

My take on it

The heading to this clip says that Dr Immanuel has treated over 20,000 patients with hydroxychloroquine.   The oral introduction says that Dr Immanuel ‘has successfully treated tens of thousands of Covid patients.’  These numbers presumably refer to the Medical Centre where she works.  In the clip following, Dr Immanuel speaks of treating over 350 patients personally, including many that are advanced in age and with various co-morbidities, without losing one.

In some places I found the audio unclear.  Hence the two question makes in the text above.

“Nobody needs to be dying from this disease. “  That has to be great news.

Dr Immanuel just wishes that people would wake up.  So do I.

Masks for kids: High Court evidence is that risk of harm was never considered

The statement

At the High Court hearing today, 30 April 2021, it was revealed to the Court that neither the Tapton School Academy Trust (which runs 4 secondary schools) nor the government had conducted any assessment of the risk of harms from requiring children to wear masks in schools.

At the same time the Court received unchallenged evidence that wearing masks could result in causing pulmonary fibrosis, being “among the worst diseases that can be suffered or witnessed. It kills exceedingly slowly, by ever-thickening matrix formation, a kind of scar tissue, obstructing the alveoli and reducing their air exchange. The illness worsens over time, and suffocates the victim very gradually. Nothing is available to the sufferer from conventional medicine.”     

Also unchallenged was evidence of psychological harm suffered by children because of the pressure upon them to wear masks and the need to conform to the authority of teachers and their peers.

Against this background, the child (whose name and school remain subject to a Court anonymity order) asked the Court for an order stopping the school encouraging mask-wearing by children.

Roger Ter Haar QC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) has reserved his judgment but indicated he expects to provide his decision in writing by next Wednesday 05 May 2021.

The source

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-masks-in-schools/?fbclid=IwAR34LpFj2fl_YadkzaJa0Y9zLd76_rTs0k_Q6dpQ-43OyCKKI5oiFIsFT1I

My take on it

Tapton Secondary School is located in the UK, so I gather that this action is proceeding in the High Court of England and Wales.

I have my own view as to the wisdom of wearing masks in response to Covid.  Those views have been formed by examining some of the arguments and evidence for and against.

Not everyone who does take that approach, reaches the same conclusion as I have.

And of course not everyone takes that evidence-based approach.

The question is, Should we expect that evidence-based approach from government?

Of course we should.

And should we expect that evidence-based approach of those who are entrusted with the care of our children, and specifically schools and teachers  – in loco parentis?

Of course we should.

To me it is unsurprising (if disappointing) that an institution such as a school should just follow government guidelines unquestioningly.  I witnessed the same attitude early last year when I contacted aged care institutions in Australia in an effort to forestall what I saw coming.  They pointed me to the government.

The government formally holds that trust.  The government is all the more responsible for weighing the evidence for and against any policy; for assessing the probable and possible impact.  The evidence is that in this case the UK government did not.

That is a breach of trust.